data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/031bf/031bf58db00e26e4b51d8d18c69a63a23955df5e" alt=""
Legalytics Deep Dive #1: All The Presidents’ Judges
Perhaps the most (or at least one of the most) important duties of the president is judicial appointments.
Perhaps the most (or at least one of the most) important duties of the president is judicial appointments.
Sophisticated writing software with AI components can now tell you how to write like particular judges by engineering writing that mirrors stylistic features of the judges’ writings.
Want more time for what matters most? MyCase streamlines your firm so you can focus on winning cases. See how much time you could save with our Law Firm Time Savings Calculator—try it now!
Overall, these justices reflect the ideological spectrum of the Supreme Court.
This analysis underscores that influence within judicial discourse is more multifaceted than meets the eye.
Knowledge of how justices engage in oral arguments compared to their written opinions can inform legal practitioners on how to better present cases.
The justices clearly assert their uniqueness with their concurrences and as this is on display, they show how the justices may be more different than meets the eye.
How to make the right decision, and why there might be another way to shape a fulfilling legal career on your own terms.
We recently used Optimized Legal Audio (OLA) to try to read the tea leaves on the audio footprint of the SEC v. Jarkesy case. Here are the results.
Optimized Legal Audio is an artificial intelligence engine in its infancy that tries to hear what judges say, read the language they use, and through this to infer their relative preference for one attorney’s argument over another’s.
Just how different is the start of this term compared with past terms?
With only a few spots at this upper echelon of Supreme Court practice, how do attorneys get repeat player experience?
From training to technology, uncover the essential steps to futureproof your law firm in a competitive market.
A matrix for scoring the justices in terms of relative power.
Ranking the current justices.
The current Supreme Court seems to not only take its cues from conservative lower court judges, but particularly from Trump’s nominees.
How does this timeframe compare with the Court’s historic opinion releases?
Where has the Roberts Court pushed the pendulum?